Digital health platforms
Add a clearer understanding of each case without replacing the product layer above it.
PI Health
PI Health helps pull different health signals into one view so teams can see what changed, what may be causing it, what may deserve attention first, and when the evidence is too weak to say more.
Why health first
PI Health is strongest where home data, symptoms, labs, and events do not fit neatly into one score or one threshold.
Intended role
Where it fits
The best near-term fit is inside digital health, clinical, or monitoring products that already handle workflow and engagement.
Add a clearer understanding of each case without replacing the product layer above it.
Support review where the data is mixed, scattered, or hard to read quickly.
Explore what may be shaping outcomes across people without losing the individual story.
Test one clear workflow problem before making broader claims.
Evidence direction
PI was evaluated on the McPhases Women’s Health dataset across real participant histories, with staged reasoning, continuity-aware rollups, and a cohort-level evidence map.
Read the evidence briefPI was also applied to a deidentified inpatient cohort, where it processed 100 users, carried 37 cases through full Stage 3 review, and kept explanation separate from intervention.
Read the evidence briefWearable-centered work shows how PI can go beyond basic dashboards and look at what may be causing the current picture.
PI is a fit for settings where review burden is high and the information is spread across many sources and teams need a clearer reason to pay attention.
Separate evidence briefs are now available for women’s health and a MIMIC-based inpatient cohort. Additional cohort briefs can follow as new runs clear review.
Current posture
What is not claimed
PI’s health story is stronger when it remains disciplined about intended purpose and non-claims.
Health conversations
The best first discussion is usually narrow: one workflow, one care pathway, or one product question.